Bits and Pieces
Presidential Election: The probable candidates are
likely Biden and Trump. The latter will happen if court decisions do not
preclude his place on the ballot. No other candidates have appeared on the
scene to change this prediction. That is lamentable on two counts: first, both
of these candidates are too old to take on the responsibilities of the
Presidency. Period. That may appear harsh to some, but I am nearing 81 and can
relate to the challenges of aging. I have experience and a long view of history
and social issues; that makes my contributions positive. But the threat of
disability or death while in office are too serious to take on without serious
examination.
Elder people have a valuable role to play in our society and
governance. I just feel their involvement ought not be tied to being elected.
Appointed, certainly.
The second count: focusing on advanced age in candidates
hinders development of younger talent. Our national leadership succession should
be an active process. Developing talents among members of any organization
builds strength and sustainability to that organization. Who are our future
leaders? What characteristics should they have? What experience and tests of
their thinking and decision making should they have? Will we have leaders in
the future who are up to the challenges of a dynamically changing work
environment?
Both political parties need to have depth of talent among
their leadership. This needs to include diversity of ages as well.
Discussion vs Argument: Want to research important
topics of the day? A lot of reading as well as video tapes are available. The only
problem is a likely imbalance of views. Take any discussion of current topics
and you will encounter argument and debate, not discussion and a mutual
exploration of the issue and its driving components. That is the sort of
background understanding needed if any of us are to best understand current
events.
An academic approach to such matters helps understanding. That
approach lays out definitions of terms as well as historical grounding of the
issue under examination. Exploring an issue requires us to consider all
elements of an issue. We need to see the ins and outs and pros and cons. If we need
to understand an issue well enough to manage its positive and negative effects,
we must know the probable costs to dealing with the issue.
In a perfect world such work would not be required. But the
world is imperfect by definition. Hard work is needed. Best we understand that
and get down to business. Debate can be helpful, but argument is not. Research,
explore and test solutions with open minds. That is a healthy way forward. The
rest is political nonsense and obfuscation.
February 15, 2024
Comments
Post a Comment