Struggles Toward Meaning
Have you always, or nearly always, worked at understanding what is happening? Or did happen? Or, what a word means, especially in the context of its sentence?
I have. All my life.
If someone said something – in person, group or on the
radio, TV or movie – and mumbled it, I wondered what they said. What I missed.
Was it important? Did it help make sense of the current action? “What did he
say?” That was a frequent question of mine to others surrounding me. I’m sure
it was more irritating to them than I, but being at a loss for missing pieces,
I was unnerved by not knowing.
This personal characteristic has made me annoying and inquisitive. I plainly ask questions. I piece the answers into my puzzles and hopefully gain understanding of each of them. My test has always been, if I can easily explain the complexity to someone else, then I know and understand what I am speaking about. Or writing.
The logic, you see, takes over the communication transaction. It becomes a simple matter of adding facts together to make sense of things. I think this is what drives most reporters. They simply have to have all the pieces and facts together, or else they cannot write clearly about the item. Sensing missing pieces, the reporter simply turns into a detective. This basic trait that makes a reporter an investigative reporter. These are the people who sense that a lot of public relations work is merely untruths attempting to place a good face on something. Politicians commonly resort to such things.
As reporters scan working stories, they become aware of what
is not presently known. They keep asking questions about the meaning of
something. Is this important? If yes, why? If no, why are we spending time on
it?
The best stories are ones emerging from mystery and
misleading mistruths. The reporter does well pulling the item together
accurately. A larger meaning, however, is commonly present. Even if the news
item is now factual and fully explained, what value has it to our daily living?
Is there something else embedded in the story that makes it much more
important? Why, indeed, was so much time spent distracting the public from
understanding the issue?
“I wonder why they said this, or what their motivation was?”
This is a critical question for the serious reader and/or reporter. Indeed, how
much history do we understand that has changed from its earliest reports? As we
know and understand more about the early story, we learn more of the who, what and
why. We become more aware of the story’s larger meaning. This is why history appears to be rewritten from time to time.
Much of life is this. Time helps us deal with it. Not always
successful, but we toil at understanding things better.
The half-truths and outright lies of political campaigns
make them odious. Even good candidates fall into this swamp. I wish we could
focus on issues and not personalities. Afterall, the personality is usually far
more apparent than the truth of the issues discussed. That alone is another
aspect of the personality involved.
Best we pay attention to facts. We will know the truth if we
stay focused.
January 10, 2024
Comments
Post a Comment