News Sources
Well, news organizations are my focus this morning.
Over the years I was an avid newspaper reader. Sometimes three
a day. Plus, a news magazine, special interest publications on top of that, and
a whole lot of interaction with news sources and writers. I knew a lot about
what was covered in news outlets. I accumulated a pretty good working knowledge
about many topics, understood their underpinnings, and all of that.
That background actually supported what I read in news
publications. There was a resonance with the articles. They connected with what
I knew and understood on the topics. Until they didn’t.
That’s when the bias of news outlets became more and more
obvious. Fox News was blatant. The Chicago Tribune became somewhat blatant. But some news retailers remained solid and
believable.
With media competition over the top today, the bias is on
full display. There are other tells as well. Take news headlines posted online.
I receive several all day long. The New York Times is one of those. So is the
Chicago Tribune. Which do I open the most? Well, let us just say it is not the
Tribune.
Why is that you ask? Because the headlines provided are
esoteric and unconnected to topics of moment in today’s news. I point this out
not because the topics the Trib covers are not newsworthy; they are. Their connection
with the larger news issues is lacking, however.
I want to know what is happening in the world of economics.
Not just business news in the USA, but also globally. I want to read about political
maneuvering by other countries and wonder how those moves will affect global
economies. I want to understand education in connection with national
competitiveness and broader quality of life. I covet news about the human
condition and how well that is being governed by powers great and small.
Yes, interests are broad and at times very specific. Researching
and reading about those topics are on the reader. I, on the other hand, seek
relevance of each topic with a broad range of other topics. No man is an island.
Neither are topics. All is related. Sometimes the reader has to be reminded of
that.
Clearly the New York Times understands this. They cover most
issues very well. They have become the news organization of the nation. Their closest
competitor in that regard is the Washington Post. The other major
newspapers are regional and not national. Even the Tribune organization, which
owns many large urban newspapers, doesn’t seem to use their advantage to
resonate with broader topics. It questions whether they even understand that resonance.
I have recently discovered the richness of YouTube. Their coverage
of topics is nearly universal. If you know the question to research, you can
find long time and recent resources on that topic. The more you search that
topic, the more YouTube feeds relevant items to your streaming channel. The
breadth of those topics is not related, but they do feed my other interests. That
connects them for me in a way. I do not lose news of those topics because they
are kept in my range of current reading.
The relevance of subject matter in the news is important. The
Times gets it. I wonder if the Trib does?
Fair or not, questions remain in my mind about the fairness
and relevance of news sources. Am I alone in this struggle?
October 25, 2023
Comments
Post a Comment