Walking Away
I have walked away from difficult situations in my past. One was a new boss hired over our division who I quickly learned was a poor leader for our future. I also became aware of a neurosis or two that bedeviled him. Rather than spend another 16 years building new programs I had already done, I simply took another career route.
Another time I had labored for many years building a local
institution (all volunteer) to a pinnacle of effectiveness when I learned new
leadership had other ideas and gutted our capabilities. I walked away from
them, too, and moved to another organization that bespoke my sense of
possibility and collaborative values.
Each leave taking turned out well. I did not look back at
the old associations, only the new. Most of the previous entities survived; one
did very well; another did not thrive but did survive.
I write this recall to shine light on constructive leave
taking. One must do what one must do and feeling undervalued is a clear sign
it is time to go. Skill development in one situation also is a value needed in
other organizations and going to them is a good move for both the organization
and the person leaving to take on another challenge. These are positive
outcomes. If the leave taking is spiteful something is wrong, and that may be
on the individual, not the organization.
Sticking with a bad situation does offer opportunities for
growth. For one thing it produces skills to adapt to bad situations. Making the
best of a bad situation is worthwhile. Developing deeper skillsets to benefit
an organization and its customers often leads to remarkable creations of
products and services. Many are more effective and use fewer resources. A
win-win is discovered.
Texas has offered to secede from the United States. Non-Texans
have smiled and said, go ahead; your leave taking would benefit the other 49 states
in many ways. Same is true with major counties in some states wishing to shed
restrictions imposed on them by their state government. California, New York and Massachusetts have heard these
gripes before. A seceding county, however, is not very likely; much too much
complicated, and not a large enough win for the county.
Political parties experience secession talks too. Leaving
the fold, however, doesn’t really solve their problems. Other opportunities are
not readily available. Sticking with it and working toward constructive change
is a better option. Trouble is, there are not enough people willing to do this.
Democracy is a hard master. It takes volunteers and citizen
involvement to build the difference worth the effort. If no effort is provided,
the system digests the problems and continues its path toward a bad end. It will
only change for the better when better minds become dedicated to doing the hard
work.
This is true in every organization. What matters becomes
dynamic only when it is shared by other dedicated persons. That collaboration
becomes impactful because of the passion of values present. Quitting that
scenario only guarantees failure of the good for the bad.
Leaving taking can be constructive or destructive. The difference
is found in the findings of serious analysis and detachment of ego. Those things
of value give life to both the society at large and the doers of the good. Both
are immeasurable. But oh, what a difference is made.
August 15, 2022
Comments
Post a Comment