Bits and Pieces
Nancy Pelosi’s Husband: Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House of Representatives in the US Congress. That is a powerful position of leadership. She also has a private life. One of those private elements is her marriage, her family members and her husband. Mr. Pelosi has had a recent interaction with traffic police with a charge of Driving Under the Influence of alcohol. If the facts turn out to be true, Mr. Pelosi will have to follow the law and its protocols to the conclusion of the matter. This is not a reflection on Mrs. Pelosi. She had nothing to do with it.
Plus, this has nothing to do with her leadership responsibilities.
Why then is this ‘fair game’ for the press. The photos
accompanying the news articles are not of Mr. Pelosi. No, they are of Nancy
Pelosi. Stupid editing of the story. Shameful political nonsense. Shame on the
press corps, and more shame on the political opposition that insists on pushing
this sort of incivility forward.
Church and State: a politician takes a stand on a
public issue. The issue has more than political sides, it also has opposition
in church circles. The clergy take note and bar the politician from church
sacraments. The church thinks this is OK. It is not. Why? Because the church
has just then made church and state the real issue.
If I vote for a candidate to represent my views, I do not do
so for religious or theological reasons. I do so for public policy purposes
that impact the common good. That ought to be theologically supportable, but
I do not require it from my candidates. I expect them to do their job under the
law, civil law, not church law.
We Americans despise nations that follow religious law as
national law. That is a particular problem in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle
East in general. National traditions based on religious belief are one thing;
rule of law laid out per religious teachings is another. The Taliban would not
agree with me. Saudi Arabia would politely disagree with me. But Iran? Iraq? And
others? Tell me the stories of India and how she lives with a polyglot of
religions and survives to this day? With over 1.1 billion people?
America recognizes many holidays – Christmas, Easter, Good
Friday to name a few. But having a day off is one thing. Punishing someone for
not observing the holiday strictly is the opposite thing. It is not right.
Abortion rights is one thing. Church teachings on being
against abortions is another thing. So is choosing to have an abortion. One doesn’t
make that decision lightly. This is so true in our country today that abortions
have declined significantly over the past 10 years.
So why does the church cross the church/state barrier?
Because it can.
The slippery slope in America has been engaged. Watch your
step!
The Bold and the Reckless: The Young and Reckless
soap opera aside, seems modern social behavior is to reach out take a purse
from a stranger, knock on their car window with a gun, demand their car, and
drive off with it. Or smash and grab store window trinkets worth a lot of
money. Perhaps the bold think it's fun to walk into a party, fill up on free
food, then shoot a few partygoers. Later, they roam city
streets, shoot a few innocent bystanders on the street corner, then go on a
wild ride on the expressways shooting up a few cars during their romp.
Perhaps this does not describe the urban area in which you
live, but it does for mine. Of course, there are over 10 million in our metro
area, so the chances of getting shot are miniscule. That may be true, but the
fear level magnifies the threat, and we stay put at home. I’d like to drive to
the campus of the University of Chicago and visit old haunts. I’d like to see
the new seminary building that replaced the old, and while at it, see the old
building and how they have adaptively reused it.
But I don’t dare. The highways and byways needed to travel
there and back are fraught with violence. Why take the chance?
When I first went to seminary, my landlady was most anxious
for me. I didn’t think twice about it. Later I did, but while there nothing bad
happened. I was impervious to the threat. Then. Now, I am past my then
landlady’s age and I feel as she felt then.
Why is this happening? Not my age of fear, but the bold and reckless
conduct that turns neighborhoods into battlefields?
June 1, 2022
Comments
Post a Comment