Antisemitism

Not certain this is a good title for today’s post, but I wish to comment on recent attacks on universities concerning accusations of antisemitism. Higher education is mostly open minded about many historical facts, and what then ensues as value statements.

In point of fact, universities have been the common denominator in researching and educating society at large about factual findings in history, political thought, science and many other areas. They encourage free speech and open dialogue on all these matters. Free discussion is a primary means to pose questions, state what is on your mind, then compare the varied ideas and opinions for what appears to make the most sense. Do these opinions and statements fit the facts, research and logic?

This discussion often formalizes research. Identifying first the question or variable in need of more understanding and facts, research projects form and pursue new findings that will advance our knowledge of the topical area. Little by little understanding of complex issues improves over time.

Discussing antisemitism with a friend recently, I asked what had caused the flurry of attacks on university and college presidents. What was pressing these folks to resign, and why? And who was doing the pressuring?

It seems the current issue has been caused by student protests of Israel’s management of its military actions in Gaza. Protestors are voicing concerns over massive death, injury and destruction at the hands of Israel. Their point is that Israel is waging a war out of balance with the cause of the war. These protests can be viewed as an attack on Israel’s credibility. It also questions American support for Israel. Politically motivated commentators are stating that if a university does not quell such demonstrations, then the school is supporting an attack on Israel.

That begins a witch hunt that focuses on denigrating the university and its leaders.

Interesting. Where have the witch hunters been when Israel consistently debased the peace process with Gaza? Where were the outcries and condemnation of Netanyahu’s continued building of Israeli settlements in Palestinian regions? Where is the analysis of Netanyahu’s political gamesmanship that manipulates public opinion to keep a sharp edge on the Israeli/Palestinian problem? How much of this is used to maneuver for political support on a host of internal Israeli legislation and policy setting?

Having an opinion on these matters is not grounds for a charge of antisemitism. I have consistently held views opposing Israel’s lack of progress toward peace. I am personally not antisemitic. I support Jews and abhor the discrimination they have weathered from the beginning of time. I stand with them. But I also stand with an honest approach to building long lasting peace in the region.

I understand the enormous pressure on Israel. Arab states have been bad negotiators for a very long time. But there have been opportunities for progress. We have witnessed those advances. We understand the lack of trust on both sides.

However, peace in the Middle East is a must. All powers that can be effective in finding a solution are called upon to do the work. This requires Israel to collaborate and compromise for its own long-term good.

Holding that view is not discriminatory. It is a solemn belief that solutions can be found, and waging peace truly brings benefits to everyone.

My experience with American universities does not support a broadside accusation of antisemitism. Shame on those who insist it does.

January 29, 2024